Updated latest article about Jolla and the N900

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/articles/2015-09-18_nokia_heir_and_hardware_keyboards.md b/articles/2015-09-18_nokia_heir_and_hardware_keyboards.md
index 6d9e3c4..cddc829 100644
--- a/articles/2015-09-18_nokia_heir_and_hardware_keyboards.md
+++ b/articles/2015-09-18_nokia_heir_and_hardware_keyboards.md
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@ But sadly this does not change the reality that at least my other half keyboard
 Of course the _Jolla_ has it's strengths: _SailfishOS_ is a pleasure to use[^0] and the faster internals are essential to using it without having to wait on the device every other interaction. Also the replacement of _GTK_ with _Qt's QML_ as the primary _UI_ framework was definitly the right step and being able to execute _Android_ applications is useful for when there is no _SailfishOS_ counterpart.  
 But while slow the _N900_ is superior in other situations such as direct sunlight and precision usage using a stylus. The transreflective background of the display means that one can turn off the backlight completly if the sun is shining bright enough and use it as a source of light whereas the _Jolla_ display is often not readable in bright sunlight.
 
-While _SailfishOS_ is more fluid and looks nice, _Hildon_ with all transitions turned off feels quick in a way that an animated UI simply does not. Add to that the various unlock methods such as sliding out the keyboard, sliding back the camera protector or sliding the unlock button and the daily usage of the _N900_ feels more intutive and quicker than any touch based interface I've tried. This problem is increased by the recent _SailfishOS_ UI overhaul that replaces gestures with buttons in various parts of the interface. Many of the nice properties of _Jolla's_ interface such as sliding from the top of the display to lock and sliding up to access the application menu from the lockscreen now have to be patched back into the UI using custom repositories.
+While _SailfishOS_ is more fluid and looks nice, _Hildon_ with all transitions turned off feels quick in a way that an animated UI simply does not. Add to that the various unlock methods such as sliding out the keyboard, sliding back the camera protector or sliding the unlock button and the daily usage of the _N900_ feels more intutive and quicker than any touch based interface I've tried. This problem is increased by the recent _SailfishOS_ UI overhaul that replaces gestures with buttons in various parts of the interface. Many of the nice properties of _Jolla's_ interface such as sliding from the top of the display to lock and sliding up to access the application menu from the lockscreen now have to be patched back into the UI using custom repositories. Admittedly it is great that this is even possible without requiring deep changes to the system such as _jailbreaks_ as in other mobile systems. Furthermore with the right set of patches from the _Warehouse_ it is possible to e.g. enable nearly system wide landscape mode support which is very nice.
 
-What this all boils down to is that the best device for me today would be a _N900_ from _2009_ with updated internals[^1]. There is not really any question that the _Jolla_ is the better _Smartphone_ and more painless in day to day usage but the _N900_ is still the better if not only _mobile computer_. Contrary to the _Jolla_ it feels _natural_ to use CLI applications in _Hildon_, ticker with the system and use it like I use my laptop - until I have to wait for the dated hardware to finish computing what to do about my press on the _close window_ button.
+What this all boils down to is that the best device for me today would be a _N900_ from _2009_ with updated internals[^1]. However there is not really any question that the _Jolla_ is the better _Smartphone_ and more painless in day to day usage[^2] but the _N900_ is still the better if not only _mobile computer_. Contrary to the _Jolla_ it feels _natural_ to use CLI applications in _Hildon_, ticker with the system and use it like I use my laptop - until I have to wait for the dated hardware to finish computing what to do about my press on the _close window_ button.
 
 [^0]: …or at least was until the update to _2.0_ which in my opinion changed the linear and gesture based concept for the worse. Even worse the official reasoning for e.g. the replacement of sliding cover actions to buttons was that it would be - of all the things - more intuitive to users coming from other operating systems. If the goal is to sell devices to _Android_ users why not simply produce an _Android_ smartphone?! The whole point of _Jolla_ was that it is _unlike_ (to cite their marketing slogan) and caters to users who don't want _Android_ or _iOS_ but something more in the spirit of the old _Maemo_ devices… This situation is just so _sad_. _Nokia_ is finished after their management failures and subsequent hostile takeover, _Jolla_ is divided into two companies, their founder has left and their future is becoming questionable - I fear what the hardware landscape will look like in a couple of years.
-
-[^1]: [Neo900](http://neo900.org/) aims to change that but it is both slow moving and the updated hardware is not that much better than what we already have. Nevertheless this shows that I am not the only one who dreams of the good old times with the _N900_.
+[^1]: [Neo900](http://neo900.org/) aims to change that but it is slow moving, very expensive and the updated hardware is not that much better than what we already have. Nevertheless this shows that I am not the only one who dreams of the good old times with the _N900_.
+[^2]: Which is why I have switched from the _N900_ to the _Jolla_ in the first place and will continue to use it as my primary mobile device despite my newfound _N900_ nostalgia.
 
 [FunkyOtherHalf]: http://funkyotherhalf.com/